GALEN: digital library of UCSF.
PubMed@UCSF Search GALEN Site Map Contact Us

Collections and Resources Research Assistance General Services and Info Education and Technology
 
 
HELP & HOW-TO
 
Tobacco Lawsuit Summary Chart
 
Jump To:
 
Date Filed
Party of AG/Govnr.
Case
Firms
4/14/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Alaska v. Philip Morris, Inc. et al. No. 1JU-97915 CI
n/a
8/20/96
Republican / Republican
 
 
5/5/97
Democrat / Republican
State of Arkansas v. American Tobacco Co., et al. No. IJ 97-2982
6/12/97
Republican / Republican
People of the State of California et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al.
in-house
6/5/97
Republican / Democrat
State of Colorado et al. v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al. Case No. 97CV3432
n/a
7/18/96
Democrat / Republican
Connecticut v. Philip Morris, Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford/ Norwalk at Stamford
Silver, Golub & Teitell, Stamford, Conn.; Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Penn.
2/21/95
Democrat / Democrat
Florida v. American Tobacco, CL95-1466, 15th Judicial Circuit
Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, S.C.; Fonvielle & Hinkle, Tallahassee, FL; Gentry & Phillips, Jacksonville, FL; Brown, Terrell, Hogan, Ellis, McClamma & Yegelwel, Jacksonville, FL; Howard & Associates, Tallahassee, FL; Kerrigan, Estess, Rankin & McLeod, Pensacola, FL; Maher, Gibson and Gulley, Orlando, FL; Montgomery & Larmoyeux, West Palm Beach, FL; Nance, Cacciatore, Sisserson, Duryea & Hamilton, Melbourne, FL; Law Offices of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Scruggs, Millette, Lawson, Bozeman & Dent, Pascagoula, Miss.; Yerrid, Knopik & Valenzuela, Tampa, FL; Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (pro bono)
8/29/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Georgia et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., CA E-61692
in-house
1/31/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Hawaii v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. et al. CIVIL NO. 97-0441-01
Galiher DeRobertis Nakamura Ono, Law Corporations, Honolulu, HI; Ness, Motley, Loadholdt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC
Idaho
Dismissed
7/9/97
Republican / Republican
 
 
11/12/96
Republican / Republican
People of the State of Illinois v. Philip Morris et al., Circuit Court of Cooke County, IL, No. 96-L13146
Hagens & Berman, Seattle, WA; Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, IL; Steven C. Mitchell, Phoenix, AZ; Barrett Law Offices, Lexington, MS; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, CA.
2/19/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Indiana v. Philip Morris, Inc. et al. Cause No. 49D__-9702-CT-___
Hagens & Berman, Seattle, Wa.; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, CA; John W. "Don" Barrett, Lexington, MS; Steven Mitchell, Phoenix, AZ; Sommer & Barnard, Indianapolis, IN; Plews Shadley Racher & Braun, Indianapolis, IN; Young & Young, Indianapolis, IN; Barrett & McNagny, Fort Wayne, IN; Leagre & Barnes, Indianapolis, IN; and Mitchell Hurst Mitchell & Dick, Indianapolis, IN.
11/27/96
Democrat / Republican
State of Iowa, v. R.J. Reynolds et al., Iowa District Court for Polk County, No. CL71048
Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C., Des Moines; Ralph Walker Law Firm, P.C, Des Moines; Simmons, Perrine Albright & Ellwood PLC, Cedar Rapids; Hawkins & Norris, Des Moines and Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC.
8/20/96
Republican / Republican
State of Kansas v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., District Court of Shawnee County Case No. 96-CV-___
Entz & Chanay, Topeka, Kansa; Scruggs, Millette, Lawson, Bozeman & Dent, Pascagoula, MS; Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC
3/13/96
Democrat / Democrat
Ieyoub v. American Tobacco, 96-1209 14th Judicial District Court, Calcasieu Parish
Badon and Ranier, Lake Charles, LA; Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, New Orleans, LA; Barrett Law Offices, Lexington, MS; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, CA.; Baggett, mcCall and Burgess, Lake Charles, LA; Scruggs, Millette, Lawson, Bozeman & Dent, Pascagoula, MS
Maine
6/18/97
Democrat / Independent
 
 
5/1/96
Democrat / Democrat
Maryland v. Philip Morris, 96-122017-CL211487, Baltimore City Circuit Court
Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, Baltimore, MD
12/19/95
Democrat / Republican
Massachusetts v. Philip Morris, 95-7378, Middlesex Superior Court
Brown, Rudnick, Freed & Gesmer, Boston, MA; Thornton, Early and Naumes, Boston, MA; Schneider, Reilly, Zabin & Costello, Boston, MA; Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, CA; Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (pro bono)
8/21/96
Democrat / Republican
State of Michigan v. Philip Morris Incorporated, et al ., Ingham County Circuit No. 96-84281-CZ
Scruggs, Millettte Lawson, Bozeman & Dent, Pascagoula, MS; Ness Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC.
8/17/94
Democrat / Independent Republican
Minnesota v. Philip Morris, C1-94-8565, 2d Judicial District
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, MN
5/23/94
Democrat / Republican
Moore v. American Tobacco, 94-1429, Jackson County Chancery Court
Scruggs, Millette, Lawson, Bozeman & Dent, Pascagoula, MS; Barrett Law Offices, Lexington, MS; Paul T. Benton, Biloxi, MS; Fredrick B. Clark, Greenwood, MS; Lewis & Lewis, Clarksdale, MS; Cumbest, Cumbest, Hunter & McCormick, Pascagoula, MS; McTeer & Associates, Greenville, MS; Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC; Oswald and Reed, Pascagoula, MS; Pittman, Germany, Roberts & Welsh, Jackson, MS; Rhoden, Lacy, Downey & Colbert, Jackson, MS; Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (pro bono)
5/10/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Missouri v. American Tobacco Co., et al. No. 972-1465
 
5/5/97
Democrat / Republican
State of Montana v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al.
n/a
Nebraska
8/21/98
Republican / Democrat
?
?
Nevada
5/21/97
Democrat / Democrat
New Hampshire
6/4/97
Democrat / Democrat
 
 
9/10/96
Republican / Republican
5/27/97
Democrat / Republican
State of New Mexico et al. v. American Tobacco Co., et al.
 
1/27/97
Republican / Republican
State of New York et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc. et al.
Not yet determined
5/8/97
Republican / Republican
State of Ohio v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al. No. 97CVH05 5114
 
8/22/96
Democrat / Republican
6/10/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Oregon et al. v. American Tobacco Co., et al.
n/a
4/22/97
Republican / Republican
n/a
n/a
6/18/97
Republican / Republican
State of Rhode Island et al. v. American Tobacco Co., et al.
n/a
South Carolina
5/9/97
Republican / Republican
n/a
Ness, Motley, Loadholdt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC (others unknown)
2/23/98
Republican / Republican
State of S. Dakota v. Philip Morris et al. (No 98-65)
in-house (At the time of filing the parties entered into a stipulated stay which expires on 1/1/99).
Texas
Settled
3/28/96
Democrat / Republican
Texas v. American Tobacco, 5-96CV91, Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Provost & Umphrey, Beaumont, TX; Reaud, Morgan & Quinn, Beaumont, TX; O'Quinn, Kerensky, McAninch & Laminack, Houston, TX; Williams, Bailey, Wesner, Houston, TX; Nix Law Firm, Daingerfield, TX; Laurence Tribe and Arthur Miller, Harvard Law School (may be paid by the law firms)
9/30/96
Democrat / Republican
96 CV 0829W
Giauque, Crockett, Bendinger & Peterson, Salt Lake City, UT; Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC.
5/29/97
Democrat / Democrat
State of Vermont et al . v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al. No. 744-97
6/5/96
Democrat / Democrat
Washington v. American Tobacco, 96-2-15056-8SEA, Superior Court of Washington, King County
Luvera, Barnett, Brindley, Beninger & Cunningham, Seattle, WA; Hagens & Berman, Seattle, WA
9/20/94
Democrat / Democrat
McGraw v. American Tobacco, 94-1707, Kanawha County Circuit Court
Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Charleston, SC; Hunt & Barber, Charleston, WV; Hill, Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, Charleson, WV; Segal & Davis, Charleston, WV
2/5/97
Democrat / Republican
State of Wisconsin v. Philip Morris Inc., et al. No.____
n/a
 
 
Date Filed
Party of AG/Govnr.
Case
Firms
Los Angeles
(not a state suit)
 
 
 
 
New York City
(not a state suit)
10/17/96
n/a
State of Alaska v. Philip Morris, Inc. et al. No. 1JU-97915 CI
n/a
Puerto Rico
9/20/04
 
United States of America v. Philip Morris Incorporated, et al.
 
San Francisco
(not a state suit)
6/6/96
n/a
City and County of San Francisco v. Philip Morris, C-96-2090, Northern District of California
Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, CA
6/16/97
 
 
 
 
 
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management | Privacy Statement | Conduct Policy
Last updated: 27 September 2004 | ©2008 The Regents of the University of California
 
UCSF Medical Center Alphabetical Index. About UCSF. University of California, San Francisco.