Dubois G. Le rideau de fumée. Paris: Le Seuil; 2003.

Agam G, Argamon S, Frieder O, Grossman D, Lewis D. Complex document information processing: Prototype, test collection, and evaluation.  Proceedings of SPIE International Society of Optical Engineering and The Society for Imaging Science and Technology Conference on Electronic Imaging. San Jose, CA; 2006.

Anonymous. Meet the tobacco papers: Where the tobacco papers come from, how to locate them, and what's missing. Multinational Monitor. 1998 July-August. http://www.allbusiness.com/3471137-1.html

Anonymous. How to access tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 2002;11(Supplement 1):i39. 

Anonymous. Big mouth. New Internationalist. 2004(369):16-17.

Balbach E, Gasior R, Barbeau E. Tobacco industry documents: Comparing the Minnesota depository and internet access. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:68-72.

Balbach E, Barbeau E. Beyond quagmires: The evolving quality of documents research. Tobacco Control. 2005;14:361-62.

Bero L. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annual Review of Public Health. 2003;24:267-88.

Brown C, Rubin D. Causal markers in tobacco industry documents: The pragmatics of responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics. 2005;37:799-811.

Brown C, Rubin D. Being frank: Ideology, construction and intertexuality in the tobacco industry’s “A frank statement." Texas Linguistic Forum. 2005;48:61-71.

Carter S. Tobacco document research reporting. Tobacco Control. 2005;14:368-376.

Chapman S. The stench of tobacco industry dirty linen. (editorial.). Tobacco Control. 2000;9:261-262.

Chapman S. Regulating the global vector for lung cancer. Lancet. 2006;367(9512):706-708. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68078-1

Collin J, Lee K, Gilmore A. Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: An invaluable global resource needs radically improved access. Lancet. 2004;363:1746-1747.

Concar D. The smoking gun. New Scientist. 1998;160:30-31.  

Cullen D, Wayne G, Connolly G, Koh H. A guide to deciphering the internal codes used by the tobacco industry: Harvard School of Public Health Division of Public Health Practice Tobacco Research Program; 2005.

Cummings K, Pollay R. Exposing mr  butts’ tricks of the trade. Tobacco Control. 2002;11(Supplement 1):i1-4.

Diethelm P, Rielle J-C, McKee M. Links with the tobacco industry… authors’ reply to Ragnar Rylander. Lancet. 2005;365:211-212.

Dyer C. Secret smoking documents finally to go on the web. BMJ. 2004;328:1335.

Friedman L, Daynard R. Scottish court dismisses a historic smoker's suit. Tobacco Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e4.

Glantz S, Barnes D, Bero L, Hanauer P, Slade J. Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry: The brown and williamson documents. JAMA. 1995;274:219-224.

Glantz S. The truth about big tobacco in its own words. BMJ. 2000;321:313-314.

Glantz S, Slade J, Bero L, Hanauer P, Barnes D. The cigarette papers. Berkeley,: University of California Press; 1996.

Godlee F. Who faces up to its tobacco links. BMJ. 2000;321:314-315.

Grimm D. Is tobacco research turning over a new leaf? . Science. 2005;307:36-37.

Hebert R. What's new in nicotine & tobacco research?  . Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2006;8(4):481-486.   

Henningfield J, Santora P, Stillman F. Exploitation by design: Could tobacco industry documents guide more effective smoking prevention and cessation in women? Addiction. 2005;100:735-736.

Hiilamo H, Hirschhorn N. Tobacco industry documents from outside sources: New perspectives on industry strategies on local levels. Central European Journal of Public Health. 2006;14(4):175-179.

Hirschhorn N. Tobacco industry documents – secrets revealed. Global Health & Environment Monitor. 2000;8:7.

Jamrozik K. Barbarians inside the gate: How the tobacco industry penetrated the world health organization. (book review of “tobacco company strategies to undermine tobacco control activities at the world health organization.” Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2001:633-634.

Jazbinsek D. Forschen schadet ihrer gesundheit [research harms your health]. Weltwoche (Zurich). 2005(47). http://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2005-47/artikel-2005-47-forschen-schadet-ih rer-gesundheit.html

Kretzchmar W, Jr, Darwin C, Brown C, Rubin D, Biber D. Looking for the smoking gun: Principled sampling in creating the tobacco industry documents corpus. Journal of English Linguistics. 2004;31:31-47.

Lambe M, Hallhagen E, Boethius G. [the cynical game of the tobacco industry: Many years efforts to deny or cover-up the negative effects of tobacco are revealed by the forced publication of internal documents]. [article in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 2002;99:2756-62.

Lee K, Gilmore A, Collin J. Looking inside the tobacco industry: Revealing insights from the Guildford depository. Addiction. 2004;99:394-397.

Lee K. Peering through the smokescreen. New Scientist. 2004(2478):42-45.

Le Gresley E, Muggli M, Hurt R. Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7:27-40.

Liberman J. The shredding of BAT's defence:  Mccabe v British American Tobacco Australia. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:271-274.

Mackay J. The tobacco industry in Asia: Revelations in the corporate documents. Tobacco Control. 2004;13(Supplement 2):ii1-3.

Malone R, Balbach E. Tobacco industry documents: Treasure trove or quagmire? Tobacco Control. 2000;9:334-338.

Malone R. Tobacco industry documents: Comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:285.

Malone R, Bero L. Chasing the dollar: Why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003;57:546-548.

Malone R. Telling the truth about big tobacco. Journal of Addiction Nursing. 2004;15:107-109.

Malone R. Nursing's involvement in tobacco control: Historical perspective and vision for the future. Nursing Research. 2006;55(4 Suppl 1):S51-S57.

McKee M. Competing interests: The importance of transparency. European Journal of Public Health. 2003;13:193-194.

Michel M, Bero L, Bright T. Creating a text data-mining application for use in public health informatics.  Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004, IEMBS '04, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2004 1-5 Sept; 2004. p. 3214-16.

Morabia A. The controversial controversy of a passionate controversialist. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002;55:1207-1213.

Muggli M, LeGresley E, Hurt R. Big tobacco is watching: British American Tobacco’s surveillance and information concealment at the Guildford depository. Lancet. 2004;363:1812-1819.

Parascandola M. Skepticism, statistical methods, and the cigarette.  A historical analysis of a methodological debate. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2004;47:244-261.

Proctor R. Should medical historians be working for the tobacco industry? Lancet. 2004;363:1174-1175.

Ravnitzky M, Weigum J. Filtered or unfiltered information: Choices in how to make the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository records more accessible to the public. William Mitchell Law Review. 1999;25:715-740.

Rubin D. University of Georgia tobacco documents corpus and text analysis tools. 2005. http://www.tobaccodocs.uga.edu/TDC/

Thompson G, Wilson N. Directly eroding tobacco industry power as a tobacco control strategy. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2005;118(1223). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/118-1223/1683/

Todd J, Rennie D, McAfee R, Bristow L, Painter J, Reardon T, et al. The Brown and Williamson documents: Where do we go from here? JAMA. 1995;274:256-258.

Walburn R. The role of the once-confidential industry documents. William Mitchell Law Review. 1999;25:431-438.

Yerger V, Daniel M, Malone R. Taking it to the streets: Responses of African American young adults to internal tobacco industry documents. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7:163-172.

[Back to Top]